Or should I just pull the trigger on it? If I go with this I’ll get the 3° flat and 12° bead TIRs with it along with the XHP70.3 HI in it.

Anything similar with a better driver?

TIA

by 666fixed

4 Comments

  1. bunglesnacks

    Not anything that uses an XHP70 or GT-FC40 with a TIR. The driver is about as good as it gets it’s just the UI is the problem.

    But for other emitters yeah a Noctigon DM11 is better imo. It has Anduril. Would be amazing if the optics in the M21H were compatible with the DM11 or pretty much any other TIR light but they are not. Or if the M21H has a better UI. Oh well though I have an M21H on the way myself because I love the idea of a 7070 emitter with a TIR.

  2. Educational-Air249

    Better driver no. Convoy drivers are great, some of the best performing with a 70.3 HI. Yes, UI could be improved, but that doesn’t prevent me from buying any Convoy lights

  3. FalconARX

    The upgrade to this is the Acebeam P17.

    Better build, better driver, better weather sealing. Only thing it cannot offer is the choice of different temperature 70.3s for 90+CRI.

    One of the biggest issues knocking the Convoys down is waterproofing. You end up trading the customizability for weatherproofing with Convoy.

Write A Comment